View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES

MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2006

 

I.                    CALL TO ORDER

 

A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Liberty, Missouri was held in the Council Chambers at City Hall on June 26, 2006 with Mayor Robert T. Steinkamp presiding.  Mayor Steinkamp called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

 

II.         INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 

The invocation was given by Council Member Anna Marie Martin who then led the pledge of allegiance.

 

III.       ROLL CALL

 

Roll call was answered by Mayor Robert T. Steinkamp; Coni Hadden and Harold Phillips, Ward I; LeRoy Coe and Anna Marie Martin, Ward II; John Parry, Ward III; and Nick King, Ward IV.  Also in attendance were Curt Wenson, City Administrator; Cynthia Boecker, Assistant City Administrator; Steve Hansen, Public Works Director; Brian Hess, City Engineer; Craig Knouse, Police Chief; David Tedesco, Police Captain; Gary Birch, Fire Chief; Linda Tyree, Finance Director; Kathy Goode, Finance Manager; Diana Adams, Finance Analyst; Dee Mizell, Finance Analyst; Marcella McCoy, Finance Manager; Steve Anderson, Planning & Development Director; Rebecca Wymore, Planner; Dan Fernandez, Planner; Sara Cooke, Public Relations Coordinator; Tony Sage, Information Services Manager; Jane Sharon, Deputy City Clerk; Jason Noble, The Kansas City Star; Angie Borgedalen, Liberty Tribune; and 19 members of the public.

 

IV.       APPROVE MINUTES AND SUMMARIES

 

A.        REGULAR SESSION MINUTES OF JUNE 12, 2006

 

Council Member Hadden requested corrections be made to the minutes.  On page 9, she asked that it be clarified that no Operation Green Light proposals were considered and that her comment regarding air quality be amended to reflect she stated Liberty’s air quality monitor readings are worse than for other cities.  Council Member King moved to approve the minutes as corrected.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried 5-0-1.  Council Member Coe abstained due to absence.

 

B.         STUDY SESSION MEETING SUMMARY OF JUNE 19, 2006

 

            Council Member Hadden moved to approve the meeting summary as distributed.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

V.        CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION

 

Mayor Steinkamp noted citizens present had requested to speak to two matters.  Mayor Steinkamp placed a three-minute time limit on those wishing to speak.  He asked for those wanting to address the expansion plans of the Liberty Christian Fellowship Church to speak first.  City Administrator Curt Wenson stated that the church is proposing a 3,300 square foot expansion on its property and a plan is being reviewed administratively by staff because it is less than 10,000 square feet and therefore does not require the Planning & Zoning Commission and Council consideration.  He noted a meeting had been scheduled in the Council Chambers for Friday, June 30, at 9:00 a.m. for residents and church representatives to discuss the plans with City staff.  Mr. Wenson stated the staff had sent comments in a letter to the church and the plans are currently being revised before being resubmitted to the City.  He stated that churches are like schools in that they may operate in residential areas.  With any plans to build, however, churches must follow City requirements, just like any other applicant.  If the church wanted to operate a business out of this property, it would first have to get the property rezoned from its current residential zoning.  He stated that Aquila or any other utility company can move its own utility lines without any City process as long as the move doesn’t take place on public property.  Mr. Wenson stated that the church is planning an expansion of current parking to add 40 spaces, but that was in the initial plans, which could change.

 

Keith Tompkins, 1000 Amesbury, stated he lives in Canterbury and sent a letter to members of the City Council because he is concerned about the secretive manner in which the church has proceeded, without notifying any of the nearby residents.  He stated the property is in a 100-year flood plain and the plans call for both an expanded building and raised parking lot.  Mr. Tompkins stated there will be run-off problems as well as problems from the added lighting, traffic and pollution.  He asked Council Member Parry if he could have a business in the back of his residential property and Mr. Parry responded he could not.  Mr. Tompkins gave Mayor Steinkamp petitions signed by residents in the area.

 

Mayor Steinkamp clarified that speakers should direct comments and questions to him and not address the council members directly.  Dick Byerley, 924 Amesbury, stated he thought it was a good idea when the church bought the residence to the south of the church two years ago.  He said he appreciated the City offering him and the others present this evening an opportunity to speak, but expressed concern that the residents would not have known about this project beforehand had it not been for Aquila working on utility lines.  He asked the Council to go onsite and look at the area that is in a flood plain.  Mr. Byerley stated that expanding parking will only add to the problems for his neighbors with respect to storm water runoff.  He asked the Council to get involved, instead of having staff review and rubber stamp the plan.  He handed letters to the mayor to distribute to the Council.

 

Nancy Masciovecchio, 1118 Amesbury, stated that she is already dealing with the flood plain issue and has lost part of her back yard to erosion.  She stated this plan will increase the problem.  Ms. Masciovecchio handed photos to the mayor, which he stated he would have available at the Friday meeting, after giving Council an opportunity to see them.  Ms. Masciovecchio clarified that the photos were taken from her property facing the creek and that the spillway is up further from her property.

 

Kim May, senior pastor for the Liberty Christian Fellowship Church, stated he returned from vacation to learn of the residents’ concerns.  He stated the church will work with the City and the residents regarding the church plans.  He noted the expansion is much less than 10,000 square feet, the church is not planning to put a business into the building and they are not considering a playground at this time.  He stated that property values increase, not decrease, when they are near a church.  Pastor May stated the church wants to work with the neighbors.

 

Mayor Steinkamp stated again that a meeting has been scheduled on this matter for Friday, June 30 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers.

 

Mayor Steinkamp asked those wishing to speak to the stop sign at Moss and Sunset to limit their remarks to three minutes each.  Julie Struble, 36 Moss Avenue, stated that the 4-way stop was changed to stop signs on Moss.  This means there is no slowing down at the top of the hill, where there is a crosswalk.  She expressed concern for the foot traffic.  Ms. Struble stated she had spoken with Mr. Hansen and he said the 4-way stop had never been warranted, but she does not believe that is a good reason for removing it.  She stated it is a blind hill and drivers and pedestrians can’t always see cars approaching until they are almost at the crosswalk.  She stated that removal of the 4-way stop makes the area unsafe.  She added that effect on the


school children walking to school and any bus stops won’t be known until fall when school starts again.  Ms. Struble stated she had been told the 4-way stop was put in after a failed petition and further review by staff.  She asked the Council to consider replacing the 4-way stop at this intersection.  Mayor Steinkamp asked for clarification of her comments about sight distance.  Ms. Struble said it is going east to west and even the other direction as well.

 

Tom Murdock, 14 Moss Avenue, stated he has pulled out of the alley between Moss and Fairview and cut people off, because he did not know the sign had been changed.  He asked what prompted the removal of the 4-way sign, why it was put up in the first place and before it was removed, why staff did not check into why

it was first installed.  He expressed concern about possible accidents because, even though the speed limit is 25, the traffic slowed down a little to stop at the intersection.  Now that is not required, the traffic drives above that limit.  He asked what the procedure would be to get the 4-way stop back.  The mayor stated the Council would listen to comments now and consider the next steps later.

 

Jeff Knold, 25 Moss Avenue, gave the mayor a petition signed by residents, and stated that he has three school-age children who would be walking to Franklin School.  He stated that safety is his main concern with this intersection.  He stated there have been a couple of accidents there since the sign was changed.

 

Julie Halsey, 33 South Fairview Avenue, stated that the sign has been a 4-way stop as long as she has lived there and recently, reflector strips were added.  Ms. Halsey stated she enters Sunset from the alley and in the wintertime, when the alley is not plowed, she has skidded into the street.  She stated it will be more dangerous without the 4-way stop at Moss.  She added that she was told the stop signs would be considered if a petition was signed by 75% of the residents and asked how to determine if that number is met.

 

Mayor Steinkamp thanked those commenting tonight and stated that staff would follow-up on the matters mentioned.

 

VI.       MEETING SCHEDULE

 

VII.      CONSENT AGENDA

 

VIII.     PUBLIC HEARINGS

 

A.        *SOUTH LIBERTY CORRIDOR SECTION STUDY AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN – RESOLUTION

 

Planner Rebecca Wymore reviewed the application to amend the Comprehensive Plan by including the section study.  She stated the South Liberty Parkway Phase I Corridor Study was completed in 2003.  At the time it was presented in 2004, staff was directed by Council to work with HNTB and expand the scope of the study including both Phase I and Phase II.  Recommendations were gathered through public input and a charrette was held in September 2004 to get community input regarding the design and alignment of Phase II of the parkway.  A land use charrette was held in April 2005 and on May 9, 2005 property owners met to discuss the future land use plan for the parkway corridor.  Overall, the discussion was positive and the property owners had only a few revisions to the plan.  On May 16, 2005, the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission met in a joint study session to review the plan.  The alignment was generally accepted at that time though it was not formally adopted.  HNTB incorporated the land use revisions into the traffic analysis and economic analysis.  A final draft of the study was reviewed in a Council study session in February 2006 at which time staff was directed to bring the study forward as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.  Ms. Wymore noted one minor modification to the map, which was a residential area just south of Withers Road and is now shown as mixed-use, at the request of the property owners in May 2005.  She stated the Planning & Zoning Commission voted unanimously to incorporate the South Liberty Parkway Corridor Study into the Comprehensive Plan.

 

Council Member King asked if there were any changes from the earlier draft to the one received with this staff report.  Ms. Wymore stated it is the same.

 

Mayor Steinkamp opened the public hearing and asked if anyone present wished to speak in favor of the amendment.  Seeing none, he asked if anyone present wished to speak in opposition to the amendment.  Seeing none, he closed the public hearing and returned discussion to the Council.

 

Council Member King moved to amend the Comprehensive Plan by incorporating the Section Study.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion.  Mrs. Martin stated this document represents a lot of foresight and planning and all citizens should see it.  The motion carried 5-0-1 and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2251.  Council Member Parry abstained.

 

B.         LIBERTY TRIANGLE

 

1.         *REZONE 8.8 ACRES FROM R-1C, STANDARD SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT – LOTS 33 & 34, NORTH HAVEN ESTATES, LIBERTY TRIANGLE – ORDINANCE

 

Ms. Wymore stated the application was to rezone 8.8 acres in the Liberty Triangle to C-2, General Business District.  The application meets all requirements for adequate public facilities as the site will have access to sewer and water systems.  The site will have access to College Street and Blue Jay Drive.  The purpose of the application is to prepare the site for redevelopment with retail uses and restaurants.  Ms. Wymore continued, stating that two recommendations in the Future Land Use Plan address the Liberty Triangle.  They include promoting redevelopment of the Triangle and, as a Gateway to Liberty the Triangle should be designed in a distinguished manner that creates a sense of arrival.  The Economic Development Plan encourages the City to be proactive in assisting with the redevelopment of this site as a regional retail center.

 

Ms. Wymore stated the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the application.

 

Mayor Steinkamp opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the application.  Seeing none, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the application.  Seeing none, he closed the public hearing.

 

Document No. 6541 was read.  Council Member Hadden moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member King seconded the motion.  Council Member King asked if the property to the right of this is already zoned for commercial development.  Planning & Development Director Steve Anderson said it is.  The motion carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9000.

 


2.         *FINAL PLAT-REPLAT OF NORTH HAVEN ESTATES, THIRD PLAT – SHOPPES AT LIBERTY TRIANGLE – ORDINANCE (PUBLIC HEARING NOT REQUIRED)

 

Ms. Wymore stated this is a replat in the same general area as the previous application and creates two lots.  There is access to adequate public facilities and direct access to Blue Jay Drive and College Street, both of which will be extended.  The area is expected to develop with retail uses and restaurants.  The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval.

 

Council Member Phillips asked if the deadend will be a problem for the northwest corner property.  Ms. Wymore stated access to that property would be included in its development.

 

Mayor Steinkamp asked if additional replats would need to be brought forward.  Mr. Anderson stated that multiple buildings were permitted on one lot.

 

Document No. 6542 was read.  Council Member King moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Coe seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9001.

 

C.         *SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 6-UNIT RESIDENT GROUP HOME AT IMMACOLATA MANOR – RESOLUTION

 

Planner Dan Fernandez reviewed the application for a new 6-unit residence building, a future residence and use of the Manor House for conferences and retreats.  The site has direct access to Plummer Road and adequate public facilities.  The new residence building is going in just north of the current Manor House.  After that building is completed, the Manor House will be used by the administration.  A group home is included in this application to be built in the future.  The residence building will be the same design as those included in a previous special use permit.   The application meets the standards of review for a special use permit and the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit with the stipulation that the ratio of residents to staff workers remains the same.

 

Council Member Martin asked what would happen if the future building was not built in the next two years.  Mr. Anderson stated this special use permit is for an indefinite period and the construction of the additional building is not time limited.  Mrs. Martin asked what authority the City had to stipulate the ratio of residents to staff.  Mr. Anderson stated any City involvement would be complaint driven and that was a protection included in the special use permits of the early 1980s.  Mrs. Martin commented it was like telling a business how it could operate.

 

Mayor Steinkamp opened the public hearing and asked if anyone present wished to speak in favor of the application.  Dennis Tuck, 12319 Moffet, Liberty, stated he is an architect for the project and the plan is for expansion of buildings on the site.  Council Member Coe asked if the new residence would tie into the existing building.  Mr. Tuck said it would not and there would not be any expansion of the Manor House.  Mayor Steinkamp asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in opposition to the application.  Seeing none, he closed the public hearing.

 

Council Member Phillips moved to approve the resolution with the stipulation that the ratio of residents to staff would remain the same.  Council Member Hadden seconded the motion, which carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2252.

 

IX.       ORDINANCES, CONTRACTS AND RESOLUTIONS

 

A.        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF VENDOR PAYMENTS FROM JUNE 2, 2006 THROUGH JUNE 16, 2006 – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6543 was read.  Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion.

 

Vote on the motion was as follows:  Council Member Phillips – yes; Council Member Martin – yes; Council Member Hadden – yes; Council Member Coe – yes; Council Member Parry – yes; Council Member King – yes.  The motion carried unanimously; it was approved by the Chair and inscribed in Ordinance No. 9002.

 

B.         LOTS 2 AND 3, BENT OAKS

 

1.         *FINAL PLAT-REPLAT – ORDINANCE

 

Mr. Fernandez stated this is a replat of two lots on 1.56 acres.  There is access to improved streets via Oak Crest.  By moving the lot lines and reducing the drainage easement, the lot would be buildable.  The application conforms to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval.

 

Council Member Hadden asked for clarification of the changes to the storm water drainage as a result of this replat.  City Engineer Brian Hess stated the drainage would go towards the street and noted that, off South Liberty Parkway a channel had been recently enclosed, reducing the need for the larger drainage easement.  Some drainage would go to the street and some to inlets off the new pipe system.  Council Member King asked if the drainage was being changed following improvements and how that made the lot more buildable.  Mr. Hess stated the replat increases the lot size along with a reduced drainage easement to make the lot buildable.  Council Member Martin asked for clarification that adequate drainage would remain as a result of this replat.  Mr. Fernandez said it would.

 

Document No. 6544 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Hadden seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9003.

 

2.         DISCLAIMING UTILITY AND STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENTS – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6545 was read.  Council Member Coe moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 


Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9004.

 

C.         *FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SHAPED STEEL ADDITION – RESOLUTION

 

Mr. Fernandez reviewed the application for construction of a 17,153 square foot addition in the Heartland Meadows Industrial Park for Shaped Steel.  He stated there is access to adequate public facilities and street access is via Heartland Drive.  The addition would be to the west of the existing building and the lot to the south of the loading docks will be expanded to accommodate larger shipping trucks.  Landscaping will be added along the drive and outside lighting will be provided by wall pack lights mounted to the building.  Construction materials include precast concrete panels along with prefinished metal wall panels and roof.  Two garage/loading docks will be added, bringing the total number to four.

 

The application conforms to the UDO and the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the application.

 

Council Member King asked if this would have an impact on roadway development tax.  Mr. Anderson stated that would be assessed at the time building permits are pulled and would amount to approximately 50 cents per square foot.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the final development plan.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2253.

 

D.        AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH TRANSYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT WITHERS ROAD AND SOUTH WALES – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6546 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion.

 

Council Member Phillips asked about the original bid for this project.  Public Works Director Steve Hansen stated bids received in January were substantially higher than what was originally budgeted.  At that time the project was re-bid in an attempt to reduce the costs.  He noted that engineering services are not bid out in the traditional sense but firms are invited to provide qualifications and a bid for services.  Mr. Hess stated that the original project design was to cover the design of all three signalization projects.  The January bid for the sign installation was approximately $190,000.  The amount budgeted at that time was $150,000.  Since the warrants had not yet been met at the Withers Road and South Wales intersection, it was removed from the original project.  Because of some of the design work already completed for the other two projects can be used on this project, the $15,000 is lower than costs would ordinarily be for a single project.

 

Council Member Coe asked about the delay in getting the signal installed.  Mr. Hansen stated the work done recently has been underground work.  Mr. Hess added that the concrete cannot be poured until the bolts are received.

 


Council Member Parry asked what the City’s match is for the $150,000.  Mr. Hansen said it is a 20 percent match but there is no increase to the construction costs, which is within budget.  Mr. Hess stated some funds came out of what was in the Liberty 2010 capital fund, the same funding for the Craig Crest project and because $400,000 was originally budgeted for that project, which is now at $280,000, there are additional funds which can be used for this signalization design.  Mr. Parry asked if the balance of funds would remain in the Craig Crest project.  Mr. Hess said they would, as they may be used for that project.  The motion carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9005.

 

E.         AUTHORIZATION FOR THE FILING OF APPLICATIONS WITH MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR STORM WATER GRANTS – RESOLUTION

 

Council Member Martin moved to authorize the filing of grant applications.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion.  Council Member Hadden expressed surprise and appreciation that many grants could now be authorized under a single resolution.  The motion carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2254.

 

F.         MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL REGARDING INTEROPERABILITY COMMUNICATIONS – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6547 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Hadden seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion.  Council Member King asked for clarification of the interoperability function.  Police Captain David Tedesco stated that this allows those on different frequency to communicate in an emergency.  Mr. King asked if additional equipment would be required.  Captain Tedesco stated that was being purchased through the Mid-America Regional Council.  Council Member Parry asked if this capability had been available in the past.  Captain Tedesco stated that Clay County had a smaller system in place now.  The motion carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9006.

 

X.         OTHER BUSINESS

 

A.        BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER FOR ROAD SALT – MOTION

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the purchase.  Council Member Coe seconded the motion.  Council Member King asked for clarification of the purchase in light of the report that there is sufficient stock at this time.  Mr. Hansen stated that road salt is purchased annually and this is actually for 2007.  The requirement to ensure delivery comes earlier each year.  He stated the report should be corrected to state this is a 2007 purchase.

 

Council Member Phillips expressed concern about the 1.3 million pounds of salt that ends up in the system.  He asked if there is any more environmentally-friendly alternative.  Mr. Hansen stated there are some, but in some cases require different equipment and are considerably more expensive.  He noted that salt is not always used alone and sometimes sand is used, depending on the weather conditions.  Staff indicated it would look into alternative deicing materials that could be utilized.

 

The motion carried unanimously.

 


B.         *2005 AUDIT REPORT

 

Finance Director Linda Tyree introduced Mia Frommelt with McGladrey & Pullen, who reviewed the results of the 2005 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and the compliance report.  Ms. Frommelt noted that of the entire report the external auditors actually own only one page and that is the letter, in which the City was given an unqualified opinion, which means that the City complies with general accounting standards.  The financial statements now include columns for government and business, but continue to be tracked on a full accrual basis.  She stated that the independent auditor has issued an unqualified report and that other findings were not material and not considered significant.  She also noted that the audit is a snapshot look at assets on December 31, 2005.  If there were any issues of concern, they would be noted in the letter and none were identified.

 

Council Member King asked for clarification of the statements which state the auditor will not give an opinion and then states later that an opinion is being given.  Ms. Frommelt stated that the audit is conducted under the standards of the AICPA, which require tests for compliance, but do not allow a legal opinion to be issued by the auditor.  The requirement to give an opinion as to the federal project review is only to state that the records were tested and the City is in compliance.  Ms. Frommelt added that the audit is a very involved process and takes about three weeks of working with staff to review City records.

 

Council Member King asked for clarification of the City not needing the 90 days ability to operate because it does not transfer funds out of the General Fund.  He asked if there is a lower rule of thumb for organizations with this practice.  Ms. Frommelt stated the rule is broad to accommodate many types of Missouri entities.  She stated that it can depend on the strategic plan and can sometimes increase to 20%.  She added that auditors will get concerned if the fund balance gets below double digits.  Mr. Wenson stated that other cities fund balances had been increased over time due to the activity and risk.

 

Ms. Frommelt continued, reviewing the net expenditures.  She stated the largest expense is for public safety, followed by public works and this is not unusual.  Positive balances are expected for business type activities such as water and sewer.  She reviewed changes to the reporting required by changing accounting standards and noted that changing net assets has been added to the report.

 

Ms. Frommelt stated the City’s equity is 55 days for general expenditures and some one-time expenditures could increase the number of days if some revenue is delayed.  Council Member Parry asked what the number of days were in 2004.  Ms. Frommelt said it was about 60 days but it is important to look at the average over a period of time, such as five years and look at what the General Fund is funding.  Liberty’s number can be lower because there are no transfers out.  Mr. Wenson noted that another city had recently removed an enterprise fund and placed golf course expenses under the general fund.  Under these circumstances, he noted that at least 90 days would be needed.  Council Member King asked about the relation of the number of days to the percentage.  Ms. Frommelt stated that the number of days, divided by 365 results in the percentage of funds.

 

Mr. Wenson stated the City is financially very sound and will continue to use the sound accounting practices.  He stated that the City had $52 million in capital assets, which need to be increased with stagnant sales and property taxes.  The City needs to look to the future.

 


XI.               MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR

 

Mr. Wenson stated there would be no meeting on July 3 and there are currently no items for the regular session on July 10, so a study session may be added for that date.  On July 17 the Council will consider several items in study session.  He also noted that soccer and baseball tournaments had been held at the Fountain Bluff Sports Complex with 1,300 players participating.

 

XII.      MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

 

Council Member Phillips expressed appreciation for the citizen input this evening and asked the staff to consider creative traffic calming options when addressing the stop sign issue, since the intersection is in a historic neighborhood.  He also asked the staff to look into and provide information about the cost of alternatives to use of road salt on the streets.

 

Council Member Martin stated that a lot of home owners had expressed valid concerns about the 4-way stop at Moss and Sunset and she asked for some history.  She stated that the road was a drag strip at times before the 4-way stop was added and she has received complaints about tires hitting curbs when they round the curve to Kansas Street.  She stated there should be some sort of control in the area.

 

Mayor Steinkamp stated the issue could be addressed as a study session item on July 10.  Mr. Hansen offered some background noting that the 4-way stop had been added when improvements were made along Sunset about 10-12 years ago.  The 4-way stop was not removed after the project was completed as a result of requests from citizens in the area.  There have been numerous complaints about the 4-way stop being in place since that time.  He noted that the 4-way stop does not really slow down the traffic.  He stated the change to a 2-way stop is on a 90-day temporary order but the staff will act on direction received from the Council.  He stated that an amendment to the City Code will be brought forward for Council to consider and it will have the option to repeal the 4-way sign.  Mr. Hansen stated that the 4-way stop sign is not warranted, noting there is no 4-way stop at Fairview Avenue one block to the west.  He stated the staff looks at the traffic patterns and warrants being met in determining the placement of stop signs.  Mr. Wenson asked to let the staff review this matter, including the liability associated with putting signs in locations where they are not warranted.

 

Council Member Martin asked if staff had received any requests to remove the 4-way stop sign at this location.  Mr. Hansen stated those in favor of the sign being removed were happy.

 

Mayor Steinkamp suggested further discussion on the matter at the July 10 meeting.  Mr. Wenson stated that citizens speaking to the matter this evening would be contacted by staff.

 

Council Member Coe stated that the stop sign should slow traffic and the cross traffic on Fairview, which is heavily traveled, can’t see oncoming vehicles.

 

Council Member Parry stated he would appreciate a clearer understanding of what makes churches different from others building in residentially zoned areas and that this being a staff review doesn’t help.  Mr. Wenson stated that the plan is still under staff review but the church is held to no different standards than those currently in place.  He stated the landscape buffer appears to be in good shape and when the revised plans are submitted, some additional questions can be addressed.  Mr. Wenson added that the UDO permits administrative review of plans under 10, 000 square feet and this project is for 3,300 square feet.  He stated this standard is used by most cities.  All this information will be laid out at the meeting on Friday morning.

 

Mayor Steinkamp asked for this item to be added for an update at the July 10 Council meeting, unless a consensus is reached at the meeting Friday.  He asked that the Council receive more information about the matter before a decision is conveyed to the church.  Mr. Wenson stated the staff would keep the citizens involved as communication is very important.

 

Council Member King asked about the relationship between the Farmer’s Market and the City.  He noted that a newspaper article which indicated participation in the market is shrinking.  Mr. Anderson stated that, while there is an ordinance in place that permits the Farmer’s Market to operate the City does not control that operation.  The Farmer’s Market Association establishes its own operating procedures.  Mr. King expressed interest if finding ways to attract people to the downtown the way Kansas City does with its market.  Mr. Wenson stated that HDLI could be encouraged to take this up and discuss ways to increase participation. Council Member Hadden stated the members of the Association have ongoing discussions about changing the bylaws.  Deputy City Clerk Jane Sharon stated that both the agreement between the City and the Association as well as the ordinance in the City Code might need to be reviewed, depending on what changes were made in the Association’s bylaws to make sure all were consistent.

 

Council Member King stated for the record that he would like the budget for roads to be $1 million instead of $600,000.  He also asked for an update on the signal at 291 and Claywoods.  Mr. Hess stated that the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) is still reviewing the plan, following which bids for the improvements will be let.  Mr. King stated that any progress would be much appreciated.

 

Council Member Hadden stated that she had seen the use of concrete blocks with open weave for parking areas.  Mr. Hansen stated that this could be considered, but the soil here is clay and does not typically allow for the water to drain into the soil.

 

Council Member Parry thanked the staff for getting Liberty Drive reopened to traffic.

 

Mayor Steinkamp asked why the signal installation in the Triangle had been delayed.  Mr. Hansen stated electronic controller equipment had not yet been received.  He added that this signal is the responsibility of a private contractor and all are anxious to see the intersection open.

 

Mayor Steinkamp reminded council members to contact staff for reservation to attend the Westgate Division Missouri Municipal League dinner, when the civic awards will be announced.

 

XIII.     ADJOURNMENT

 

The meeting adjourned at 9:24 p.m.

 

 

                                                                                    __________________________________

Mayor

Attest:

 

 

_____________________________________

Deputy City Clerk